Two-seaters · Plug-in hybrid · model year 2026
Aston Martin Valhalla vs Ferrari 296 GTB
The Ferrari 296 GTB edges the Aston Martin Valhalla by only 2 MPG: 18 against 16 combined in model year 2026.
Side by side
| Measure | Aston Martin Valhalla | Ferrari 296 GTB |
|---|---|---|
| Combined fuel economy (best version) | 16 MPG | 18 MPG |
| City | 14 MPG | 16 MPG |
| Highway | 19 MPG | 22 MPG |
| Annual fuel cost | $5,150 | $4,550 |
| Tailpipe CO2 | 486 g/mile | 398 g/mile |
| Lowest rated version | 16 MPG | 18 MPG |
| Rated versions | 1 | 1 |
| All-electric range | 6 mi | 8 mi |
| Rank in class (best combined rating) | 18th of 20 | 9th of 20 |
| Class | Two-seaters | Two-seaters |
| Powertrain | Plug-in hybrid | Plug-in hybrid |
Better figure in bold; each model's most efficient version.
Fuel economy and cost
Fuel bills differ by $600 a year. The Ferrari 296 GTB comes to $4,550 and the Aston Martin Valhalla to $5,150, both at 15,000 miles a year.
Where each one ranks
Within their class the Aston Martin Valhalla is tied for 18th of 20 two-seaters, in the bottom quarter. The Ferrari 296 GTB is tied for 9th of 20 two-seaters, in the lower half.
The Aston Martin Valhalla has 1 rated version, from 16 to 16 MPG. The Ferrari 296 GTB has 1, from 18 to 18 MPG. For the most efficient versions, the Aston Martin Valhalla is rated 5 higher on the highway (19 against 14), while the Ferrari 296 GTB is rated 6 higher on the highway (22 against 16).
The two versions closest in rating are Valhalla: 4.0 L, 8 cyl hybrid, Automatic 8-spd, AWD at 16 MPG and 296 GTB: 2.9 L, 6 cyl hybrid, Automatic (AM-S8), RWD at 18, 2 MPG apart.
Ratings by model year
Only model year 2026 is rated for both, so there is no trend to compare.
| Model year | Aston Martin Valhalla | Ferrari 296 GTB | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 16 | 18 | -2 |
| 2025 | not in data | 18 | n/a |
| 2022 | not in data | 18 | n/a |