Standard SUVs · Electric · model year 2026
Acura ZDX vs Lucid Gravity
For model year 2026, the Lucid Gravity gets 111 MPGe combined and the Acura ZDX 91: a 20 MPGe lead, or 22% on the lower figure.
Side by side
| Measure | Acura ZDX | Lucid Gravity |
|---|---|---|
| Combined fuel economy (best version) | 91 MPGe | 111 MPGe |
| City | 100 MPG | 115 MPG |
| Highway | 83 MPG | 106 MPG |
| Annual fuel cost | $850 | $700 |
| Tailpipe CO2 | 0 g/mile | 0 g/mile |
| Lowest rated version | 83 MPGe | 90 MPGe |
| Rated versions | 3 | 10 |
| All-electric range | 327 mi | 337 mi |
| Rank in class (best combined rating) | 13th of 90 | 2nd of 90 |
| Class | Standard SUVs | Standard SUVs |
| Powertrain | Electric | Electric |
Better figure in bold; each model's most efficient version.
Fuel economy and cost
Under the file's assumptions the Lucid Gravity costs about $700 a year to fuel and the Acura ZDX about $850: $150 a year apart on 15,000 miles.
Where each one ranks
Within their class the Acura ZDX is 13th of 90 standard SUVs, in the top quarter, ahead of 87% of the others. The Lucid Gravity is 2nd of 90 standard SUVs, in the top quarter, ahead of 99% of the others.
The Acura ZDX has 3 rated versions, from 83 to 91 MPGe. The Lucid Gravity has 10, from 90 to 111 MPGe. For the most efficient versions, the Acura ZDX is rated 17 higher in the city (100 against 83), while the Lucid Gravity is rated 9 higher in the city (115 against 106).
The two versions closest in rating are ZDX AWD: electric motor, Automatic (A1), AWD at 89 MPGe and Gravity Dream w/21F22R wheels (3R): electric motor, Automatic (A1), AWD at 90, 1 MPGe apart.
Ratings by model year
Only model year 2026 is rated for both, so there is no trend to compare.
| Model year | Acura ZDX | Lucid Gravity | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 91 | 111 | -20 |
| 2025 | not in data | 108 | n/a |
| 2024 | 90 | not in data | n/a |